Intel Core i5 9400T vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

VS

Intel Core i5 9400T

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i5 9400T with 6 cores 1.8GHz and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX with 32 cores 3.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core i5 9400T 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Lower TDP (35W vs 280W)

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 11 months late

Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 2666)

Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3.0)

Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 1.8GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 9MB)

More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 14nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Core i5 9400T

1185

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX +68%

1992

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Core i5 9400T

4161

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX +236%

13993

Blender

Intel Core i5 9400T

50

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX +1728%

914

Intel Core i5 9400T

VS

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

General Parameters

Apr 2019

Release Date

Mar 2022

Intel

Manufacturer

AMD

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

-

Coffee Lake

Core Architecture

Chagall PRO

i5-9400T

Processor Number

-

LGA-1151

Socket

AMD Socket WRX8

UHD Graphics 630

Integrated Graphics

N/A

-

Generation

Ryzen Threadripper (Zen 3 (Chagall))

Package

-

Transistor Count

16.6 billions

14 nm

Manufacturing Process

7 nm

35 W

Power Consumption

280 W

100 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

95 °C

-

Foundry

TSMC

-

Die Size

4x81 mm²

-

I/O Process Size

14 nm

-

I/O Die Size

416 mm²

CPU Performance

6

Performance Cores

-

6

Performance Core Threads

-

1.8 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.6 GHz

3.4 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.5 GHz

6

Total Core Count

32

6

Total Thread Count

64

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

18x

Multiplier

36.0

64 K per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

256 K per core

L2 Cache

512 K per core

9 MB shared

L3 Cache

128 MB

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

-

SMP

1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2666

Memory Types

DDR4-3200

128 GB

Max Memory Size

-

2

Max Memory Channels

8

41.6 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

-

No

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

-

350 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

1050 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

-

192

Shader Units

-

24

Texture Units

-

3

Raster Operation Units

-

24

Execution Units

-

15 W

Power Consumption

-

4096x2304 - 60 Hz

Max Resolution

-

0.38 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

Intel Core i5 9400T

Official Website

-

3.0

PCIe Version

4

16

PCIe Lanes

128

SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Extended Instruction Set

-

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core i5 9400T vs Intel Core i9 9900T

2

Intel Core i5 9400T vs Intel Core i5 9500

3

Intel Core i5 9400T vs Intel Core i5 13400

4

Intel Core i5 9400T vs AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

5

Intel Core i5 9400T vs Celeron P1053

6

Intel Core i5 9400T vs Intel Core i5 12600K

7

Intel Core i5 9400T vs Intel Core i3 13100TE

8

Intel Core i5 9400T vs Intel Core i3 9300T

9

Intel Core i5 9400T vs AMD Ryzen 9 7900

10

Intel Core i5 9400T vs Celeron G1101

Related News

1

AMD's Thunderous Strike: Ryzen 9 9950X3D Performance Scores Revealed for the First Time!

2

Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies

3

NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory

4

Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB

5

AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT

6

Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card

7

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

8

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

9

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

10

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market