Home Comparison Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9 14900K

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9 14900K

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
VS
Intel Core i9 14900K
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Intel Core i9 14900K
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K with 24 cores 3.7GHz and Intel Core i9 14900K with 24 cores 3.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 5600)
Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 89.6GB/s)
Higher base frequency (3.7GHz vs 3.2GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 10nm)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
2318
Intel Core i9 14900K +1%
2358
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +7%
41540
Intel Core i9 14900K
38497
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +6%
3377
Intel Core i9 14900K
3169
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +2%
23094
Intel Core i9 14900K
22637
Cinebench 2024 Single Core
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +10%
150
Intel Core i9 14900K
136
Cinebench 2024 Multi Core
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +20%
2557
Intel Core i9 14900K
2130
Blender
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
587
Intel Core i9 14900K +14%
671
Passmark CPU Single Core
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +8%
5190
Intel Core i9 14900K
4770
Passmark CPU Multi Core
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +7%
65816
Intel Core i9 14900K
61120
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
VS
Intel Core i9 14900K

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
Oct 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Arrow Lake
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake Refresh
285K
Processor Number
i9-14900K
FCLGA-1851
Socket
LGA-1700
Arc Xe2 (Arrow Lake-S)
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
Ultra 9(Arrow Lake)
Generation
Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh)

Package

3 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
125 W
Power Consumption
125 W
250 W
Max Turbo Power Consumption
253 W
105 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100°C
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
-
Die Size
257 mm²

CPU Performance

8
Performance Cores
8
8
Performance Core Threads
16
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
5.5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
16
Efficiency Cores
16
16
Efficiency Core Threads
16
3.2 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
24
Total Core Count
24
24
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
37
Multiplier
32x
112 K per core
L1 Cache
80 K per core
3 MB per core
L2 Cache
2 MB per core
36 MB shared
L3 Cache
36 MB shared
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6400
Memory Types
DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
192 GB
Max Memory Size
192 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
102.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
2000 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1650 MHz
512
Shader Units
256
16
Texture Units
16
8
Raster Operation Units
8
64
Execution Units
32
-
Power Consumption
15 W
2.05 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
0.78 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Official Website
Intel Core i9 14900K
5.0
PCIe Version
5.0
24
PCIe Lanes
20

Related CPU Comparisons

1
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9 12900KS
2
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
3
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9 11900KF
4
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i3 4170
5
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Celeron P1053
6
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core Ultra 7 165UL
7
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs AMD Ryzen 3 4100
8
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT
9
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Celeron J4125
10
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9 14900K

Related News

1
AMD RX 8800 XT's Ray Tracing Performance Surges by 45%, Rivals RTX 4080 with 25% Power Reduction!
2
Inspiration Technology Launches UM870 Slim Mini PC: Featuring Ryzen 7 8745H and USB4
3
Ryzen 9000X3D Boost Made Easier: No Need to Leave Windows Anymore!
4
Apple M5 Chip Set to Debut: The First to Harness TSMC's New Packaging Technology
5
Kioxia Plans Production Cuts in December: Hope for NAND Flash Prices to Stop Falling and Rebound
6
Advancements in AMD Zen6 Architecture: Significant Changes and Upgrades
7
The Laptop Market Revolution: 165Hz Surpasses 60Hz as the Mainstream Refresh Rate
8
AMD Set to Unveil RDNA 4 Architecture at CES 2025, At Least One Radeon RX 8000 Series Launch Expected in January
9
RTX 50 Desktop Edition Exclusively Uses Samsung GDDR7 Memory! The Other Two Giants Focus on Laptops
10
External GPU Performance Test: AMD RX 7800M Shows 28% Higher Efficiency with OCuLink Compared to USB4 Interface
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy