AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 52% (2100MHz vs 1380MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 416.0GB/s)
12032 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 760W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A
+1635%
122.6 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q
7.066 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
May 2019
Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
780 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR6
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s
Render Config
228
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
14592
Shading Units
2560
880
TMUs
160
0
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
220.8 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.13 TFLOPS
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.066 TFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
220.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
760W
TDP
80W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MI300
GPU Name
TU104
-
-
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
146 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
N/A
Shader Model
6.6
