Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A750 vs AMD FirePro W9100

Intel Arc A750 vs AMD FirePro W9100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A750 and 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A750 +228%
17.2 TFLOPS
FirePro W9100
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Mar 2014
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2050 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
2816
224
TMUs
176
112
ROPs
64
448
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

268.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
537.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
34.41 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.20 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
275W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
Hawaii
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy