Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A750 vs AMD FireStream 9250

Intel Arc A750 vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A750 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A750 +1620%
17.2 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Jun 2008
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2050 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
800
224
TMUs
40
112
ROPs
16
448
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

268.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
537.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
34.41 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.20 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
RV770
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy