Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
7664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +29304%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380M
0.047 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jan 2010
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
7680
Shading Units
16
240
TMUs
8
120
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.424 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.848 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
46.98 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
25W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
N10M-GLM
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy