CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA GRID K260Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
+544%
14.75 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
GRID K260Q
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2013
Data Center GPU
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
1536
256
TMUs
128
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
225W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
3
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla M6
4
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA L40G
5
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile
6
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
7
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q
Related News
1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy