CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
8160 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
+24900%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro FX 1700
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Sep 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
8192
Shading Units
32
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
42W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID K140Q
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075
3
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
4
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T
5
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
6
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
7
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla M4
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 8
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA L40S
Related News
1
AMD's Thunderous Strike: Ryzen 9 9950X3D Performance Scores Revealed for the First Time!
2
Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies
3
NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory
4
Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB
5
AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT
6
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
7
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
8
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
9
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
10
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy