CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA Quadro K4000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 3GB VRAM Quadro K4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 134.8GB/s)
7424 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
+1085%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000
1.244 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro K4000
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2013
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1404 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
192bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
134.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
768
256
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.96 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1244 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
80W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GK106
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
3
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Mobile
4
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
5
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q
6
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q
7
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla M60
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
Related News
1
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
2
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
3
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
4
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
5
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
6
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
7
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
8
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
9
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
10
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy