Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs ATI Radeon X1600

NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs ATI Radeon X1600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 512MB VRAM Radeon X1600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (27W vs 185W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Jan 2007
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1470 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
-
144
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

185W
TDP
27W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
RV516
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy