Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD FirePro W7000

ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD FirePro W7000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1280
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
R500
Architecture
GCN 1.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy