Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 350W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (936.2GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
10496 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Sep 2020
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1219 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
936.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
82
-
Shading Units
10496
4
TMUs
328
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
328
-
RT Cores
82
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
189.8 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
556.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
35.58 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
35.58 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
556.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
350W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GA102
-
GPU Variant
GA102-300-A1
R500
Architecture
Ampere
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
3.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy