Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2

ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro V7350X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1243MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Unknown
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1188 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1243 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
2304
4
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
R500
Architecture
GCN 4.0
UMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
80 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy