Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

ATI FireMV 2260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2260 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1518MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (84.10GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireMV 2260
0.04 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB +5730%
2.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
May 2018
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1392 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1518 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
84.10GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
40
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.43 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
72.86 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.43 GFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.332 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
72.86 GFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
GP107-301-K1-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy