Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 GM206 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 60W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1239MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 GM206 +3865%
1.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Nov 2015
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1087 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1239 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
512
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.65 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.65 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1269 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
39.65 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GM206
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy