Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs Intel H3C XG310

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
H3C XG310 +7340%
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Nov 2020
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
DG1
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
55 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
Unknown
67 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy