Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800X Duo to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 400W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1967MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800X Duo +47118%
15.11 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Aug 2021
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1967 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
60
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
3840
4
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.8 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
472.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
30.21 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.11 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
944.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
400W
200 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Navi 21
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XLA
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy