Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA RTX A1000

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA RTX A1000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 8GB VRAM RTX A1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX A1000 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1462MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 +20953%
6.737 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Apr 2024
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
727 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1462 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
18
40
Shading Units
2304
4
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
72
-
RT Cores
18
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.78 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
105.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.737 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.737 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
105.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GA107
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy