Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA TITAN Ada

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA TITAN Ada

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 800W)
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1152GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
18392 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
TITAN Ada +290212%
92.9 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
1152GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
144
40
Shading Units
18432
4
TMUs
576
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
144
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
483.8 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1452 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
92.90 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.90 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1452 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
800W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
AD102
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
AD102-450-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy