ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA CMP 90HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 10GB VRAM CMP 90HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 320W)
NVIDIA CMP 90HX 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (760.3GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
6320 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
CMP 90HX
+27262%
21.89 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jul 2021
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1188 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
10GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
760.3GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
50
80
Shading Units
6400
8
TMUs
200
4
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
200
-
RT Cores
50
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
5 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
136.8 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
342.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.89 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
21.89 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
342.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
320W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
GA102
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
GA102-100-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.0
Shader Model
6.8
