ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 580W)
AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2736 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X2
+6940%
5.632 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2014
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
345.6GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
2816
8
TMUs
176
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
580W
200 W
Suggested PSU
950 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
4x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
Hawaii
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT
(215-0852000)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3
