AMD FirePro A320 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 and 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro A320 's Advantages
200 additional rendering cores
Intel UHD Graphics 630 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1150MHz vs 955MHz)
Lower TDP (15W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro A320
+73%
0.733 TFLOPS
UHD Graphics 630
0.423 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2020
Trinity
Generation
HD Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Base Clock
350 MHz
955 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
184
24
TMUs
23
8
ROPs
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.640 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.450 GPixel/s
22.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.45 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
846.4 GFLOPS
733.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
423.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
105.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Devastator
GPU Name
Comet Lake GT2
A320
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Generation 9.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
32 nm
Process Size
14 nm+++
1.303 billion
Transistors
Unknown
246 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5
