Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
2768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170 +3257%
5.238 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Oct 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
2816
Shading Units
48
176
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
156.0 GFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
G94B
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
G94-300-B1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy