Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX

AMD FirePro S9170 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 24GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 24GB)
Lower TDP (275W vs 355W)
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX 's Advantages
Boost Clock3300MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170
5.238 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XTX +1448%
81.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3300 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
96
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
6144
176
TMUs
384
64
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
96
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
633.6 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1267 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
162.2 TFLOPS
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.10 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
355W
600 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Navi 31
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XTX+
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy