Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 24GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900 XTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 355W)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2498MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
5744 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7900 XTX +11705%
61.39 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Nov 2022
FirePro
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1929 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2498 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
96
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
6144
20
TMUs
384
8
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
96
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
128 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.6 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
959.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
122.8 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.39 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1.918 TFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
355W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Navi 31
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XTX (215-145000146)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy