Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7750 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

ATI FirePro V7750 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7750 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (76W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7750
0.512 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +1018%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Apr 2017
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2304
32
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
25.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

76W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
Ellesmere
RV730 GL XTX
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy