Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W2100 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM

AMD FirePro W2100 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 54% (1050MHz vs 680MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 350 OEM +85%
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
680 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
384
20
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
27.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

26W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Oland
-
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy