Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +33%
3.994 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2019
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1485 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
2048
Shading Units
896
128
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
TU117
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy