Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1845MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 XT +30%
5.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Oct 2019
FirePro
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1670 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1845 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1408
128
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.04 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.39 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
324.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 14
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy