AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.33GB/s vs 38.02GB/s)
272 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
+245%
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition
0.144 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Dec 2008
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
38.02GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
320
Shading Units
48
16
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
105W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
G94B
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
