Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

AMD FireStream 9170 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.33GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
200 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 105W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170 +195%
0.497 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Feb 2008
FireStream
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
120
16
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
168.0 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

105W
TDP
45W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
RV630
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy