Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 +246%
4.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Sep 2013
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
863 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
2304
40
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
43.30 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
173.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.156 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
173.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
GK110B
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
GK110-300-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy