Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT

AMD FireStream 9270 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
560 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270 +316%
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 GT
0.288 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Nov 2007
FireStream
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
240
40
TMUs
12
16
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.212 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.212 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
288.5 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

160W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
R600
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
R600 GT (215RGFDKA13FG)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy