Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA P102 101

AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA P102 101

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 10GB VRAM P102 101 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA P102 101 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1670MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
1760 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
P102 101 +430%
10.69 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Jan 2018
FireStream
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1670 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.3GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
25
1440
Shading Units
3200
72
TMUs
200
32
ROPs
80
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
0 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.6 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
334.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
167.0 GFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.69 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
334.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GP102
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
GP102-101-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net