Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs ATI FirePro 2260 PCI

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs ATI FirePro 2260 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2260 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
More VRAM (320GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.36GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
56 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2260 PCI 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Lower TDP (15W vs 143W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS 320 +470%
0.228 TFLOPS
FirePro 2260 PCI
0.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 8
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
792 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

320MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
320bit
Memory Bus
64bit
63.36GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
40
24
TMUs
4
20
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
80 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
24.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
228.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
40.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

143W
TDP
15W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
RV620
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy