Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265 +636%
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2009
Release Date
Feb 2014
GeForce 200
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
54.40GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

69W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GT215-450-A2
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy