Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 350M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 350M
0.24 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q +924%
2.458 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Apr 2020
GeForce 300M
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
16
96
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

28W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
TU117
N11E-GE1
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy