Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 and 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1792GB)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.9GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1630 +340%
1.828 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2022
Release Date
Dec 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1740 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
24
512
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.50 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.15 GTexel/s
3.656 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GT200B
TU117-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy