Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs Intel Arc A310

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs Intel Arc A310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1750MHz vs 1590MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 90W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +5%
2.849 TFLOPS
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Oct 2022
GeForce 16
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
1750 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
DG2-128
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy