Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
856 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 +9225%
2.984 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
40
56
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
RV620
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy