Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA NVS 310

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA NVS 310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
1360 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER +4927%
5.027 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2019
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 16
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
22
SM Count
1
1408
Shading Units
48
88
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
20W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
GF119
TU116-300-A1
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy