Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD FireStream 9350

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD FireStream 9350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.1GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (120W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 +149%
5.027 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2019
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.1GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
18
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
1440
88
TMUs
72
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Cypress
TU116-300-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy