Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 112.9GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +586%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Jun 2020
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1008 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.9GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
14
192
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
56
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
33.15 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
414.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
90W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
TU106
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy