Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1147MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
4928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
CMP 100HX 210 +2363%
11.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Jan 2020
GeForce 200
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
555 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1147 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
810 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
448bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
829.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
80
192
Shading Units
5120
64
TMUs
320
28
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
96 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
146.8 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
367.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.49 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.75 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.873 TFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GV100
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy