Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs AMD FirePro W2100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs AMD FirePro W2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition and 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock680MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (26W vs 219W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition +42%
0.622 TFLOPS
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
630 MHz
-
Boost Clock
680 MHz
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
20
28
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.440 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
435.2 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
27.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

219W
TDP
26W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Oland
G92-421-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy