Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
24 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 219W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition +16%
0.622 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
448bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
27
240
Shading Units
216
80
TMUs
72
28
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

219W
TDP
171W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
GT200B
G92-421-B1
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy