Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Dec 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
392 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.54GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
4
28
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

219W
TDP
Unknown
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
RV530
G92-421-B1
GPU Variant
RV530 LE
Tesla
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy