Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand vs ATI Radeon HD 4890

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand vs ATI Radeon HD 4890

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 4890 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock980MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 124.8GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (170W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand +93%
2.634 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4890
1.36 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2013
Release Date
Apr 2009
GeForce 700
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
-
980 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
975 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
124.8GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
800
112
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.60 GPixel/s
109.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.634 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1360 GFLOPS
109.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
272.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

170W
TDP
190W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
RV790
GK104-325-A2
GPU Variant
RV790 XT (215-0758016)
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.959 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
282 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy