Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs Intel Arc A350

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs Intel Arc A350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 70% (2000MHz vs 1178MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 112.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (25W vs 120W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 960
2.413 TFLOPS
Arc A350 +27%
3.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 900
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1127 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1178 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
112.2GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.70 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
75.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
2.413 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
75.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
25W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
DG2-128
GM206-300-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy