Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon RX 7900M

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon RX 7900M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 180W)
AMD Radeon RX 7900M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 101% (2090MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
4224 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7900M +4733%
38.52 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce MX250
72
Radeon RX 7900M +3487%
2583
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2023
GeForce MX
Generation
Navi Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
1825 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
2090 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
72
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
4608
24
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
72
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
401.3 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
601.9 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
77.05 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.52 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1204 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
180W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
Navi 31
-
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Pascal
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy